<?xml 
version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="https://booksandideas.net/spip.php?page=backend.xslt" ?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>

<channel xml:lang="en">
	<title>Books &amp; ideas</title>
	<link>https://booksandideas.net//</link>
	<description>Books &amp; Ideas is the English-language mirror website of La Vie des Id&#233;es, a free online journal which has gained a large readership and established itself in France as a major place for intellectual debate since 2007.</description>
	<language>en</language>
	<generator>SPIP - www.spip.net</generator>
	<atom:link href="https://booksandideas.net/spip.php?id_mot=657&amp;page=backend" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

	



<item xml:lang="en">
		<title>The Rise of Transparency</title>
		<link>https://booksandideas.net/The-Rise-of-Transparency</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://booksandideas.net/The-Rise-of-Transparency</guid>
		<dc:date>2017-01-26T08:00:00Z</dc:date>
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:creator>Erik Neveu</dc:creator>


		<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>media</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>United States of America</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>democracy</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>transparency</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>Institut fran&#231;ais</dc:subject>

		<description>&lt;p&gt;An in-depth study of the recent history of the right to know in the United States traces the origins of the rise of transparency back to practical, anti-bureaucratic demands rather than to any ideological claims made by the generation of 1968.&lt;/p&gt;
		</description>



		
		<enclosure url="https://booksandideas.net/IMG/pdf/2017-01-26-transparency.pdf" length="255684" type="application/pdf" />
		

	</item>
<item xml:lang="en">
		<title>The Other Election</title>
		<link>https://booksandideas.net/The-Other-Election</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://booksandideas.net/The-Other-Election</guid>
		<dc:date>2017-01-16T08:00:00Z</dc:date>
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:creator>Marieke Louis</dc:creator>


		<dc:subject>International</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>democracy</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>transparency</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>press</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>Institut fran&#231;ais</dc:subject>

		<description>&lt;p&gt;The name of the new &lt;span class=&#034;caps&#034;&gt;UN&lt;/span&gt; Secretary-General, Ant&#243;nio Guterres, was revealed in October 2016. Although the transparency of this election has been celebrated, no democratic debate has really taken place concerning the programs of the different candidates, which have received very little press coverage.&lt;/p&gt;
		</description>



		
		<enclosure url="https://booksandideas.net/IMG/pdf/2017-01-16-un.pdf" length="292389" type="application/pdf" />
		

	</item>
<item xml:lang="en">
		<title>The Opacity of Consensus</title>
		<link>https://booksandideas.net/The-Opacity-of-Consensus</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://booksandideas.net/The-Opacity-of-Consensus</guid>
		<dc:date>2011-11-24T08:43:21Z</dc:date>
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:creator>St&#233;phanie Novak</dc:creator>


		<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>democracy</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>European Union</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>lobbying</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>decision-making</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>transparency</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>vote</dc:subject>
		<dc:subject>Chadoc</dc:subject>

		<description>&lt;p&gt;At the Council of the European Union, decisions are usually made by consensus. Does this mean that all the countries are of one mind? In fact, disagreements are often concealed, since it is not in the interest of most countries to publicize the fact that they have been defeated. St&#233;phanie Novak describes the various practices that consensus entails and gives an account of the opacity presiding over the exercise of joint sovereignty.&lt;/p&gt;
		</description>



		
		<enclosure url="https://booksandideas.net/IMG/pdf/20111124_opacity-consensus.pdf" length="226138" type="application/pdf" />
		

	</item>



</channel>

</rss>
